last friday i posted something supportive of gays on facebook - it was as follows: put this on your status if you know or love someone who is gay.
my wish is that people will understand that being gay is not a disease nor a choice- people who are gay are not looking for a cure but acceptance and equal rights... 93% won't copy and paste this.
will you make it your ...status for at least one hour?
The bible says what our natural function is and what isn't when it comes to sex, and when a un-natural function is used it's considered to be an abomination, it has nothing to do in "choosing" or "being", gay people taking the bible into account and following its principles I think isn't easy and we would be hypocrites to judge them.
In islam countries, they encourage sex changes but dont allow gay sex.
a textual commentary on the greek new testament, by bruce m. metzger.
chm file (e book), 1.25mb.
http://anonym-to.com/?http://rapidshare.com/files/100421737/textual_commentary-greek_new_testament.rar.
debator: How I discovery as to why evangelists believe in trinity and other religions dont, evangelists read the KJV and I just found out yesterday that the original greek in the KJV is different from the original greek in the NWT, NIV and others.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/bible/200447/1/NIV-RSV-ASV-part-of-the-Anti-Christ and watch the youtube vids.
My greek interlinear (not the kingdom) in 1 Tim 3:16 says: And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
As cattails puts it:- "[Textus Receptus / Stephanus / Byzantine Majority / Orthodox Church] codices are more recent than the Wescott & Hort (NWT NIV and others) sources [Alexandrian (Nestle, et al. texts based on Vaticanus and Sinaiticus)] which by the way in the last century older texts have been found which support the Wescott & Hort recensions."
So the W & H version (NWT) would have the Greek word for He instead of God (theos)
Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great: He appeared in a body, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory. (NIV)
No wonder why there is so much confusion, but there are points in the old testament that imply trinity and others in the new testament that dont, could some points in the bible regarding God just be a title like a fireman or a baker? This is still all to confusing for me no thanks to Late Walter Martin lol.
| English (KJV) | Strong's | Root Form (Greek) | Tense | |||
| And | g 2532 |
| ||||
| withoutcontroversy | g 3672 |
| ||||
| great | g 3173 |
| ||||
| is | g 2076 |
| ||||
| the mystery | g 3466 |
| ||||
| ofgodliness: | g 2150 |
| ||||
| God | g 2316 |
| ||||
| wasmanifest | g 5319 |
| ||||
| in | g 1722 |
| ||||
| the flesh, | g 4561 |
| ||||
| justified | g 1344 |
| ||||
| in | g 1722 |
| ||||
| the Spirit, | g 4151 |
| ||||
| seen | g 3700 |
| ||||
| of angels, | g 32 |
| ||||
| preached | g 2784 |
| ||||
| unto | g 1722 |
| ||||
| theGentiles, | g 1484 |
| ||||
| believed on | g 4100 |
| ||||
| in | g 1722 |
| ||||
| the world, | g 2889 |
| ||||
| received up | g 353 |
| ||||
| into | g 1722 |
| ||||
| glory. | g 1391 |
| ||||
would i stand correct if i said that there are more atheists here in percentage then what there was during the initial course of this forum.. im i the only one here that thinks the anti-christ to be coming true?.
Would I stand correct if I said that there are more atheists here in percentage then what there was during the initial course of this forum.
Im I the only one here that thinks the anti-christ to be coming true?
any thoughts?
it is the exact same story as jesus only 3000 years earlier.
HintOfLime" As I had said on other threads there are things that can not be explained, things that I have seen that science can not explain.
thetrueone: No watch the vid I posted
any thoughts?
it is the exact same story as jesus only 3000 years earlier.
This has something to do on what I read on this thread.
seen this on youtube, according to the original greek translation (not the kingdom interlinear) these words from the kjv are missing.???.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwvjzrqarfk.
Good point, I knew there where different bibles but not different texts! But during the 6 parts he tries to imply that Wescott & Hort does not make sense and almost in the end of part 6 he says not to trust these new bibles derived from Wescott & Hort. Funny how you pick things you never could if you were a JW.
seen this on youtube, according to the original greek translation (not the kingdom interlinear) these words from the kjv are missing.???.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwvjzrqarfk.
Did you watch the vid Chalam? 6 parts and those texts mentioned are not in either the ones quoted and the NWT, which I think NWT NIV RSV ASV all come from the Westcott and Hort text.
seen this on youtube, according to the original greek translation (not the kingdom interlinear) these words from the kjv are missing.???.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwvjzrqarfk.
Seen this on youtube, according to the original Greek translation (not the kingdom interlinear) these words from the KJV are missing.???
For crying out loud Black Sheep, you became an atheist just because of that stupid fig tree, even I agree with Cameo and Tec.
debator - Some people need more than just believe, or they are just not satisfied with the answers given about raised bible issues, its the person's decision, I think that this is also part prophecy, we wouldn't want to be part of old jerusalem would we?
